MUSING SELF INITIATIVE ACTIVITIES TO BUILD TEAM
COHESION
- By Maria Newton, Ph.D. and Jerry C. Sandberg
- (Published in 1999 Spring Volleyball USA)
Introduction
Today's volleyball coaches must pull from a very deep 'bag
of tricks' in order to develop the potential of each player and
their team as a whole. Volleyball coaches must master methods
of skill and strategy development. They must be knowledgeable
in how to best physically train their athletes and remain
abreast of medical and biomechanical advances that might
influence their coaching style.
Many of these approaches are aimed at enhancing each
individual team member's ability. The logic being that if each
individual player is stronger, better conditioned and more
skilled, then the team will be better. The adage, "There is no
I in team" rings true in this case. While improving the skill
of each singular player is a necessity, working equally hard at
developing the cohesiveness of the team is warranted.
Team Cohesion
Volleyball teams are clearly groups because they consist of
individuals that must react with and depend on each other
(Zander, 1982). Additionally, volleyball teams have a
collective identity, a shared purpose, structured patterns of
communication, a shared common fate, and a perception of the
team as a group (Carron, 1984).
Group cohesion refers to the extent to which a group/team is
a "we" rather than a collection of "I's". The level of
cohesiveness on a team can be inferred from a number of
behavioral manifestations (Caron & Dennis, 1998). Three
examples include the extent to which the members and the team
as a whole are in harmony as opposed to in conflict and tense.
Secondly, cohesive groups typically have effective and open
communication. Lastly, full commitment to the team's purpose
and goals is a characteristic of cohesive teams (Carron &
Dennis, 1998).
Enhancing Cohesion Through Team Building
The goal of any team building intervention or activity is to
promote team cohesion. Through team building it is hoped that
team members will have a greater sense of unity and shared
purpose, learn to communicate more effectively with each other,
trust each other to greater degree, and be able to function as
a team more smoothly and effectively (Newman, 1984).
Using Initiative Activities to Facilitate Team
Cohesion
One approach to team building developed by Sandberg and
Newton involves adapting low ropes course-like initiative
activities to promote team cohesion. Initiative activities are
movement-based dilemmas that are designed to challenge a team
both mentally and physically. Initiative activities are
proposed to increase team cohesion because success is dependent
on willingness to risk, cooperation, trust and
communication.
The approach developed by Sandberg and Newton is distinct
from other adventure or high/low ropes course interventions
because of the dual emphasis on physically challenging the
participants coupled with a structured post-activity
discussion.
Initiative Activities Team Building Program
Basic tenets:
1. It is essential that the entire team and coaching staff
participate.
2. Everyone is considered an equal during the process.
Coaches, incoming freshmen, assistant coaches, and graduating
seniors all must approach the activity as equals.
3. A coach and/or a team captain can lead the
activities.
4. Accomplishment on the activities is gauged in levels of
success. Failure is never mentioned.
5. Physical and mental safety are always primary concerns.
Mental safety is assured by everyone being respectful of all
responses (laughing at the quality of a team member's attempt
is not respectful; allowing someone not to participate is
respectful of their wishes). Physical safety is promoted by
being careful and employing spotters whenever necessary.
6. Each initiative activity is different but the process
remains the same. The process contains the following steps:
- With everyone in a semi-circle, the initiative activity
is introduced by the leader. The leader should provide as
few instructions as possible and only intervene while the
activity is being attempted as a last resort. Appropriate
times to intervene are when safety is a concern, when
absolutely no progress is being made, or when the level of
conflict is extreme.
- After a given period of time or at a good stopping
point, the leader stops the activity. A semi-circle is
formed around the leader.
- The leader guides a discussion (termed processing) of
the experience. The discussion is structured in a attempt
to get each team member to articulate their experience,
value other team members' experience, recognize the
importance of teamwork, cooperation, trust, and
communication, and discover ways in which their experience
on the activity can transfer to the court.
- The leader of the activity (usually the coach)
evaluates the team's experience for each initiative
activity as well as the team's feedback about the
experience. This information is used to determine the value
of repeating the exercise immediately or at a later
date.
What follows are a number of initiative activities. The name
of the activity is provided followed by the general goal of the
activity and a detailed description of the activity. Finally, a
number of discussion/processing questions are presented.
1. Let's Get Up
Let's Get Up is a great warm-up activity to get a team
focused. It increases group cooperation, support, and reliance.
To begin, pairs of players face each other, hold hands, and
squat down like a softball or baseball catcher and lean back.
The players should then try to stand up simultaneously. The
leader should choose who pairs with whom and it is advisable to
pair up players who are having difficulty working together.
After each pair has successfully stood up together, combine
the pairs into groups of four. In a small circle, each person
holds hands with the person next to them, assumes a squatting
position, and leans back. The group should then attempt to
stand up successfully. Each time the group is successful,
increase the size of the group.
Processing/Discussion questions: After the activity is
completed, the leader should assemble the group and ask the
following questions: a) What did it take to be successful in
this activity? b) What happened as the group got larger? c) Did
you have confidence that your teammates would help you up? d)
How can this experience help us on the court?
2. Human Knots
Human Knots is an activity that enhances the teams' patience
and listening and communication skills. The goal of the
activity is for the group to untangle a human knot made up of
entirely interlocking hands. Begin with an even number of
participants. Assemble the team shoulder to shoulder in a very
tight circle. Each team member then reaches across the circle
and grasps the right hand of a teammate with their own right
hand. Each team member should then reach across the circle and
grasp a different person's left hand with their own. The team
will resemble a human pretzel at this point. While continually
maintaining hand contact, the team tries to 'untie' itself.
There are two guidelines when making the knots. First, no
person should be holding onto another person's right and left
hand. Secondly, no one should be holding another person's left
hand with their right hand and visa versa.
This is a good initiative activity to manipulate. For
example, if the team leader is dominating the activity, then
blindfolding or placing a 'gag' rule on that person can be
effective. If the group finds the activity too simple, then
silencing the entire group can be productive. If the activity
is too difficult, have two team members release their hands
(not both hands, just one set of right hands or one set of left
hands). This will provide the group with two ends of the 'knot'
to work with and simplify the activity.
The following questions should be asked of the group
following the activity: a) What methods were used to
communicate? b) How important was it to listen to each other?
c) What did you have to do to be successful? d) How are
communication and listening to each other important to
accomplishing team goals
3. Stay on the Line
Stay on the line is an activity that increases awareness of
the importance of cooperation and relying on others. To begin,
the team should stand shoulder to shoulder on a designated line
(or circle) on the court. The leader should then prompt the
team to rearrange itself based on some criteria (for example,
height, birth date, shoe size, etc.) without stepping off the
line. If a team member 'falls' off the line at some point, the
activity should start over. The team will soon find out that
high levels of cooperation and reliance are needed in order to
pass each other.
Possible discussion questions include: a) What was the key
to succeeding in this activity? B) Did you find it difficult to
rely on others? C) Is there any similarity between what
happened here and what has to happen in a game in order to
succeed?
Using initiative activities can be an effective means of
enhancing team cohesion because they promote a sense of
connection and understanding between and among team members. By
following the program outlined above coaches can have yet one
more trick in their bag to enhance the overall performance of
their team.
References
Carron, A.V. (1984). Motivation: Implications for coaching
and teaching. London, Ont.: Sports Dynamics.
Carron, A.V., & Dennis, P.W. (1998). The sport team as
an effective group. In J. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport
psychology personal growth to peak performance. Mountain View,
CA: Mayfield.
Newman, B. (1984). Expediency as benefactor: How team
building saves time and gets the job done. Training and
Development Journal, 38, 26-30.
Sandberg, J., & Newton, M. (1999). Team building through
low ropes course self initiative activities. Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Zander, A. (1982). Making groups effective. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.