Highlighting a Successful Summer
by High Performance National Programs / September 09, 2009
by Jim Stone, 2009 Girls' Youth National Team Head Coach/ Women's Junior National Team Asst. Coach
This summer I've been fortunate to be able to coach at both the Girls' Youth and Women's Junior World Championships for USA Volleyball. I was the head coach for the YNT in Thailand. Upon return from Thailand, I assisted Paula Weishoff with the JNT in Mexico. Both teams finished 12th at their respective championship. I thought it appropriate that I communicate to the youth volleyball community in the United States my impression of the teams and program structure from other countries and how the USA might continue to improve what we do in youth volleyball development.
To say I was impressed with the top teams at the Youth championships would be an understatement. The top teams (probably teams 1-5) would defeat 80-90% of the Division 1 collegiate programs in the country. Again, these are 16 or 17 year old players. The athletes are tall, very fit, and very motivated. This is the highlight of the volleyball year for the participating teams/countries and they approach it accordingly. From the way teams sing their national anthems prior to the match, to how hard they play, one can tell there had been a major time investment and there is a great deal of national pride involved in performing well at the World Championships. The incredulous looks our staff received from other coaching staffs, when told that some players who might have been on the USA team but opted for club championships in the USA over the world championships, were noteworthy.
We all want our teams to compete successfully at the international level. Our junior and youth teams have never won medals at the World Championships. At this World Youth Championships, Brazil, Serbia and Belgium stood on the podium. At the Junior Worlds, Germany, Dominican Republic and Brazil were the medal winners. Is there a connection between success at this level and potential national team success? The Brazilian women's team has taken success at the youth and junior levels into their national program. The Italians are competitive at all the levels. China has a solid history of being competitive at the various age levels. I believe there is a relationship from approaching these age group tournaments in an organized and serious manner that will benefit the national team programs over the long term.
Success never happens in a vacuum. There are definite reasons for success throughout the age groups, from Youth through the Olympics. Germany, who defeated our national team twice this summer, has four regional training centers at which all the athletes for the Youth and Junior teams practice, train and compete on a year around basis. Italy has most of their team together since January. Brazil trained for several months and went to Europe and China to compete prior to the tournament. Belgium, which finished third, but might have been the best team, have the bulk of their team playing together on a year around basis. Serbia, a silver medalist, have a similar year around commitment required of the athletes. Quite often, these teams that are together year around, play in leagues with older players which certainly challenge the players to compete at a high level. In some form, most of the countries have similar approaches to youth volleyball development. Clearly our junior sport club program and sport program within our educational structure present special challenges for USAV.
We had good players on the USA Youth team. Tall, athletic, made of steel, etc. However, quite possibly for the first time in their volleyball lives, they were facing players across the net that were also tall, athletic and made of steel. The winning teams possess very good volleyball skills. To be successful internationally, the USA must become more skilled. Being a good athlete is not sufficient to guarantee success. Statistically, both the Junior and Youth teams finished in the appropriate places. Rankings of serve, pass, attack, defense and block were kept, with no USA players being ranked in the top ten. The team stats found both the Junior and Youth teams in the bottom half of the tournament in all the skills. Specifically, the skills of serve and pass are not up to international standard. We do not serve with the velocity or accuracy of other teams. Since we do not face this type of aggressive serving within the club environment, our reception skills were also lacking. The USA Youth passed at a 2.41 level on a 4 point scale. Our competition was passing at a 2.90 level. This is partially due to good passing skills, partially due to our average level of serving. We served at a 1.50 on a 4 pt. scale. This translated to our opponent being in system about 80% of the time. Defense certainly becomes more challenging with this type of serving. Another glaring difference is the outside attacking. We must have better terminating outside attackers. At the same time, these outsides must be able to receive serve. So, there is some work to do.
The players on the Youth team walked away from this tournament with a better understanding of what good volleyball looks like and what is necessary to win against the best teams in the world. The level of play was way beyond anything they would have faced in a club championship in this country. There is no substitute for this type of experience, certainly not a national club championship, and they are better and more knowledgeable players for having competed in this tournament. As a former collegiate coach, there is no doubt that competition such as the World Championships prepare a player for whatever they will face at the collegiate level. Keep in mind, it is my opinion that a lot of the teams in the youth tournament in Thailand were better than a majority of USA university teams. I would certainly encourage any youth player to participate in such a challenging environment.
What needs to be done to have our teams perform better at the Youth or Junior level internationally? I am approaching this with the opinion that doing well at the age group levels is important to future national team success. To achieve a higher rate of success at the Youth and Junior levels, there needs to be more skilled players at every level of volleyball in our country. I believe that the saying "a rising tide will raise all ships" might be appropriate. Coaches and players at every level will benefit from having more good players in the system. I suggest the following ideas might be considered:
- At the Open level of the Junior Olympic Championships, from ages 15-18, we should implement international substitution rules. This would allow many of the players that need to be international outside hitters to play six rotations a majority of the time, allowing for the development of serve receive and defensive skills.
- Perhaps, a new approach for the younger players might be considered. Until age of 13, the players play on a smaller court, with fewer players on the court, with little or no substitution. This will allow the players to touch the ball more, be more involved in the game and increase the enjoyment of playing.
- We must get the best teams, coaches and players in the country together to train, learn and compete on a consistent basis. The emphasis would be on training and skill development. Given the emphasis on high school sports and the club system currently in place, a year around system which some countries have implemented will be problematic in this country. However, the current High Performance program might be expanded to provide additional training time allowing players and teams to progress to a higher level. The club coaches in our country have done a wonderful job of developing a broad base of player participation and they need to be part of the plan to develop a deep roster of quality players capable of playing internationally and generally raise the level of play in our country. This needs to be a cooperative approach, inclusive of all parties, with the best interest of the athlete being a priority. In Europe it is normal for clubs to release players for national team events during the club season. This philosophy needs to be in place within our country.
- Coaches must teach skills during their training sessions. I was struck when the USA Women's Soccer team did not reach expectations at the last World Championship, a former USA Soccer coach said that "We play and compete too much in our country. We must spend more time teaching skills". This mirrors my opinion of club volleyball. Just playing and hoping that by osmosis the skills will develop is not a good strategy for skill development. We must spend more practice time devoted to skill development and less time focusing on competition and results. I'm reminded of an interview with Tony Bennett, the world renown singer, when asked about his practice routine. He indicated that every day in the morning, he does voice scales. I don't know too much about music, but voice scales to me might be the equivalent of passing 200 balls every day. The players on the USA Youth team found out that skill level is relative. Within this country, they are skilled. However, relative to what is going on in the world, our skills are lacking.
- In regard to the above point, more educational opportunities for the club and secondary school coaches must be put in place to assist in coaching development. This could take place in regional coaching clinics, internet educational opportunities, etc.
This was a great summer of high level volleyball for myself. These World Championships were quality events that were a joy to be a participant. I told the players of the YNT that it was their responsibility to go back to their clubs and make a positive impact based on what they saw and experienced. As coach, I feel that I have that responsibility as well. Hence the motivation for this report. Feel free to contact me with thoughts, opinions, etc.
Go back to HP Connect
Rate It
Signin to rank content.




Comments
Comments RSSOn October 22, 2009 Houston Anderson wrote
Jim, Your comment on teaching skills is spot on. But I have a question on how to go about it. It seems that in the US we have been trying to "play" more in volleyball as the studies, including using the competitive cauldron to promote competition while playing. In addition, block training has recently been frowned upon also. How would you suggest to go about this? Should we be using more "controlled" drills, or just giving more feedback during play? Is there room for some block training every day? I know this is huge subject, but any comments on this would be great! Thanks
On October 30, 2009 High Performance National Programs wrote
There is an often used phrase that has impacted on how we teach volleyball. That phrase is: “let the game teach the game”. The sport used as a beacon that volleyball coaches are told to emulate is basketball. That somehow just by playing, as they do basketball on concrete courts in the big cities all over the country, that volleyball players will develop their skills. This is making the assumption that said basketball players are skilled. This logic is flawed on several levels. The most visible is basketball and how the rest of the world has “caught up” to the USA basketball by teaching their players the fundamentals of the game via drills and repetition, while the American hoopsters are “playing”. The result of letting the game teach the game is a generation of highly athletic USA basketball players that can’t play defense, can’t shoot, don’t block out when rebounding, but, watch them dunk!! The international players, can shoot, work within a team environment, play good defense, rebound, etc.
On October 30, 2009 High Performance National Programs wrote
It is not recommended that one place a label of “right” or “wrong” when working in a teaching environment. The teaching method needs to be shaped to appeal to the audience. There needs to be a balance of performing repetitive contacts within the course of practice where lots of contacts are achieved with both verbal and video feedback, controlled play that emphasizes specific skills, and scrimmage where the above can be put into competitive environment. The successful coaches balance all of the above in a creative fashion. So, much of how you spend your practice time depends of the skill of your players and the time you have to work with them. If I’m coaching an unskilled group, and I depend on one’s serving abilities (or lack thereof) to enhance other players passing skills, I might find that the passer does not touch the ball very much, due to the server’s lack of skill. At the end of the day, there is a correlation between skill development and the number of contacts or repetitions. If I only have 90 minutes of practice available, I will run a teaching session differently than if I have four hours at my disposal. I would guess that more coaches are working within a 90 minute coaching window than a four hour window. The challenge is to construct a practice that allows the maximum number of contact within that 90 minute window.
On October 30, 2009 High Performance National Programs wrote
Do you need to play in order to develop skills? Absolutely! Scrimmage or tournaments are extremely important to a player’s skill development. I also feel there is importance to allowing a player to perform “scales” and do the skill repetition in a block fashion. I don’t feel there needs to be an either/or when shaping a teaching environment. So, I recommend a combination of drills with emphasis on skill repetitions, controlled scrimmage with varying points of emphasis, and scrimmage, with emphasis on putting skills into a competitive environment with score and statistical information being recorded. How much time you spend in each area is associated with age, time of year, the amount of time you have with your athletes, strengths and weakness within the skill library of the players, your strengths as a coach, facilities, etc? -Jim Stone
In order to comment you must be signed in.
Not a member? Register Now.